Obama and Lincoln - Similarities and Differences

Financial Statement Analysis and Stock Valuation of Oxy

INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT FIN202 | | TOPIC: Financial statement analysis and stock valuationLECTURE: PHAM LIEN HASTUDENT: HOANG MY LINH ROLL NUMBER: FB00073 CLASS: FB0609 - FPT University | | Contents I. INTRODUCTION 2 1. Main production 2 2. Segment market 2 3. Vision 2 4. Strategy business 2 II. Analysis 3 1. Common – size finance statement 3 a. Common – size balance sheet 3 b. Common – size Income statement 5 c. Ratio 6 d. Dupont 7 2. Competitor 7 III. Analysis of company’s stock 8 1. Stock 8 2. Grow rate 8 3. Require rate of return 10 4. Intrinsic value of stock 10 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Main production Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) engages in the†¦show more content†¦y Plant and Equipment | | 45,684,000 | 76.08% | 36,536,000 | 69.68% | 31,137,000 | 70.40% | Goodwill | | | | | | | | Intangible Assets | | | | | | | | Accumulated Amortization | | | | | | | | Other Assets | | | | | | | | Deferred Long Term Asset Charges | | | | | | | | Total assets | | 60,044,000 | 100.00% | 52,432,000 | 100.00% | 44,229,000 | 100.00% | Liabilities | | | | | | | | Current Liabilities | | | | | | | | | Accounts Payable | 7,854,000 | 13.08% | 7,213,000 | 13.76% | 5,597,000 | 12.65% | | Short/Current Long Term Debt | | | | | 239,000 | 0.54% | | Other Current Liabilities | 93,000 | 0.15% | 612,000 | 1.17% | 655,000 | 1.48% | Total Current Liabilities | | 7,947,000 | 13.24% | 7,825,000 | 14.92% | 6,491,000 | 14.68% | Long term Debt | | 5,871,000 | 9.78% | 5,111,000 | 9.75% | 2,557,000 | 5.78% | Other Liabilities | | 98,000 | 0.16% | 115,000 | 0.22% | 136,000 | 0.31% | Deferred Long Term Liabilities Charges | | 8,508,000 | 14.17% | 6,897,000 | 13.15% | 5,886,000 | 13.31% | Minority Interest | | | | | | 78,000 | 0.18% | Negative goodwill | | | | | | | | Total Liabilities | |Show MoreRelatedDamodaran Book on Investment Valuation, 2nd Edition398423 Words   |  1594 PagesINVESTMENT VALUATION: SECOND EDITION I will be putting my entire second edition online, while the book goes through the printing process - it will be available at the end of the year. This may seem like a bit of a free lunch, and I guess it is. I hope, though, that you can do me a favor as you go through the manuscript. If you find any mistakes - mathematical or grammatical - could you please let me know? It would help me ensure that the typos do not find their way into the final version. ChapterRead MoreApache Case Essay4043 Words   |  17 Pagesï » ¿Team 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary Oil Gas Industry Analysis Apache Managing Risk Analysis Porter 5 Forces Model Conclusion Appendix Executive Summary Apache Corporation is one of the world largest independent energy companies in the world, and is headquartered in Houston, TX. Apache has gas exploration and production company with operations in six countries, divided into seven operating regions which are Canada, Egypt, AustraliaRead MorePetrobras9596 Words   |  39 PagesEvaluates Pecom If you live in our neighborhood, you ve got to look at Argentina. It s going through a major crisis today, but it is the second largest market in South America.1 — Francisco Gros, CEO, Petrobras Joà £o Nogueira Batista, Chief Financial Officer of the Brazilian firm Petrobras, reflected on Gros’s words as he prepared for a Board of Directors meeting in July 2002. The main item on the Board’s agenda was the proposed acquisition of an Argentinean firm, the Perez Companc Group, orRead MoreMedicare Policy Analysis447966 Words   |  1792 PagesRelated to Medicare Parts A and B Subtitle D—Medicare Advantage Reforms Subtitle E—Improvements to Medicare Part D Subtitle F—Medicare Rural Access Protections TITLE II—MEDICARE BENEFICIARY IMPROVEMENTS Subtitle A—Improving and Simplifying Financial Assistance for Low Income Medicare Beneficiaries Subtitle B—Reducing Health Disparities Subtitle C—Miscellaneous Improvements TITLE III—PROMOTING PRIMARY CARE, MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, AND COORDINATED CARE TITLE IV—QUALITY Subtitle A—Comparative

Children with Capacity for Criminal Responsibility

Question: Discuss about the Children with Capacity for Criminal Responsibility. Answer: Introduction: In this case, there were two half- brothers who are involved in the offence, and at the time of offence complainant aged almost 6 years and 9 months whereas appellant aged almost 11 years 9 months. At the time of first offence, both the brothers were alone at home and there was no supervision of adult when elder brother grabbed the younger one and held him down. Elder brother put his hand on the mouth of the younger brother when younger brother crying and protest. Elder brother try to intercourse with the younger brother, and ceased to intercourse when feels that adult is returning to the house. Similar offence committed by elder brother when adult was not at home and both the brothers are alone at home. However, these facts are not in the question. The main issue was whether prosecution successfully proved that elder brother, being 11 at that time was aware that his actions were seriously wrong in a moral sense. At the age of 17 and 18, the elder brother was assessed by the trial judge on the basis of disabled range of intellectual functioning, and trial judge found that his intelligence level was very low. Trial judge held that circumstances surrounded at the time of first offence proved without any reasonable doubt that presumption had been rebutted, and trial judge also stated that at the time of second offence presumption had been rebutted. The sole and material issue for trial judge was whether prosecution successfully rebutted the presumption that the appellant in this case was doli incapax. Circumstances surrounded at the time of offence which satisfied the trial judge that appellant committed the offence after knew that his act was seriously wrong. Therefore, appellant was sentenced to an effective sentence imprisonment of the period of two years and five months with a non-parole period of 10 months. The Court of criminal Appeal agreed with decision made by trial judge, and Court stated that understanding of appellant that his actions are wrong at the time of first offence would also inform him at the time of second offence that his actions were wrong this time also. Grounds of appeal: The issue entertained by trial judge in this case was whether prosecution successfully rebutted the presumption that the appellant in this case was doli incapax. Trial judge was satisfied that the appellant committed the offence after knew that his act was seriously wrong, and The Court of Criminal Appeal agreed with decision made by trial judge. Appellant appeal in the High Court against the decision of The Court of Criminal Appeal, and this appeal was allowed by the High court on the ground that there was lack of criminal responsibility in case of offenders less that age of 14 years. Both the offences committed by offender at the time when his age was 11 to 12 years. It is general presumption that offender under the age of 14 years was not responsible because of crime committed by him. A child offender who was under the age of 14 years is not responsible for the crime committed by them, but exception is there which stated that offender under the age of 14 years is responsible for his or her offence if sufficient evidence are there to prove that offender was aware that his actions are seriously wrong, and his act is different for naughtiness and mischief. Procedural history: Reasons provided by trial judge: At the trial, use of condom by appellant was considered as the sufficient evidence to presume that appellant has the capacity to understand the moral wrongness of the act conducted by him at the time of offence. Trial judge does not give much preference to the evidence of condom for the purpose of determining whether the presumption related to doli incapax of the appellant was rebutted. His honor further stated that appellant was of very low intelligence at the time of offence. However, His Honor was satisfied that circumstances surrounded at the time of offence clearly stated that appellant clearly knew that his conduct was not right. Trial Judge consider various circumstances such as force used by appellant, appellant place his hand on the mouth of complainant, complainants evident distress, ceased to conduct intercourse when adult returned at home, and instruction made by appellant to complainant for not disclosing anything. The Court of Criminal Appeal: each member of the Court of Appeal rejected the contention that reasons provided by trial judge for second offence was unreasonable. Johnson J agreed with the reasons provided by Johnson J because he considered the difference between the knowledge related to moral wrongness of action and whether action is merely considered as naughtiness and mischief. In this both the parties considered the use of condom by appellant. On the behalf of the appellant, it was stated that behavior of appellant was sexualized but he did not realized that his conduct was seriously wrong. Prosecution argued on the behalf of this statement and stated that use of the condom is the clear evidence which shows the appellant's "preparation for, and knowledge of, wrongdoing. Argument on behalf of the appellant: On behalf the appellant, argument was stated that behavior of appellant was sexualized behavior but at the time of offence his age was only 11 and he is not able to realize that his conduct was seriously wrong. Appellant further stated that his act was merely the act sexual play, and its common for childrens to engage in such play and keep such act secret. Action conducted by appellant was beyond ordinary childish sexual experimentation, but this does not state that he understood his conduct was seriously wrong. Argument stated by respondent: Prosecutor stated that act of appellant cannot considered as the act of childish sexual experimentation because circumstances surrounded at the time of offence clearly shows that appellant clearly know that his act was morally wrong such as condom used by the appellant shows that he knows that his action was seriously wrong. Decision made by High Court and reasons for decision: High court allowed the appeal filed by appellant against the decision made by the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal on the basis of presumption that if age of the offender was less than 14 years then there was lack of criminal responsibility. Therefore, Court unanimously allowed the appeal made by appellant. The plurality of Judges that was Kiefel, Bell, Keane and Gordon JJ, held that presumption was not rebutted by the prosecution because they does not produce sufficient evidence to prove that appellant is understood the moral wrongness of the act even in case of intellectual limitations. However, conduct of appellant was beyond the ordinary childish sexual experimentation but this fact cannot be considered as appellant knew his act was morally wrong and does not considered as naughty or mischief act. Evidence related to use of condom by appellant was important and ought not to have been ignored by the appellant judges and they stated appellant at the age of 11 years have complete knowledge of anal intercourse and need to use condoms, and such things clearly state that appellant has complete knowledge of what is right and wrong. He knows how to use sexually explicit materials or had been abused. Finally, it is not possible to assume that child of 11 years and 6 months understands that inflicting hurt and distress on sibling results in serious wrongdoing, and evidence is also need which shows that there was lack of consent and observation of brothers distress. Evidences are also not there which shows development, upbringing, and school performance of the appellant because of his intellectual limitations because of which it is not possible to conclude that he is aware about the seriousness of his act. Gageler J allowed the appeal on the fact that whether evidence provided at the trial was not sufficient to prove that appellant understood that intercourse was serious wrong as per adult standards. Transcript presented by police after several years showed that behavior of appellant was not considered as normal childish behavior and he is able to understand that he get punishment if someone sees him. Other evidences related to mental capacity of the appellant shows the clear difference between the intellectual disability of the appellant and evidence related to cognitive development at the time of commitment of offence. Consequently, capacity of appellant to understand his actions were seriously wrong by normal adult standards was an unanswered question, and therefore evidences do not support the findings of trial judge related to guilt. References: Time base, RP v The Queen [2016] HCA 53: Children with Capacity for Criminal Responsibility, https://www.timebase.com.au/news/2016/AT04028-article.html. Accessed on 23rd March 2017. Austlii, Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Criminal Appeal, https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWCCA/2015/215.html. Accessed on 24th March 2017. Austlii, High Court of Australia, https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2016/53.html. Accessed on 24th March 2017. Melbourne Law school, RP v The Queen, https://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/opinionsonhigh/2016/12/21/rp-case-page/. Accessed on 23rd March 2017. High court, HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA, https://eresources.hcourt.gov.au/downloadPdf/2016/HCA/53. Accessed on 24th march 2017. High Court, RP v THE QUEEN [2016] HCA 53, https://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/judgment-summaries/2016/hca-53-2016-12-21.pdf. Accessed on 24th March 2017.

The Most Significant Inventions of the Second Half of XX Century free essay sample

It is difficult to value the role of scientific invention of the second half of XX century. But we shouldn’t forget that it is would have been impossible without countless ideas and inventions which mankind had made before. Every minute of our life is history in the making. Nowadays technical progress is developing so fast, that people who lived 50 years ago even couldn’t imagine our modern way of life. They couldn’t realize things, which is widespread and habitual for us. Today’s events can soon enter history books as well. As for me, it is difficult to pick out three the most important inventions from inventions which are not less important than them. So I think that the most significant inventions and events of the last 50 years are: invention of computer, internet and the latest discovery is cloning, which has been made not long ago, in 1997. Our century is a century of developing informational connection. We will write a custom essay sample on The Most Significant Inventions of the Second Half of XX Century or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page When Charles Babbage invented the first calculating machine in 1812 he could hardly have imagined the situation we find ourselves today. Computer becomes like a brain of human but the only thing it cannot do is to feel. Nowadays computers play a huge role in our day-to-day life. They simplified our life a lot. Importance of computers increased rapidly. They help housewives in the kitchens and in systems of air traffic control. This invention resulted to other discoveries, like internet and cd-rom. Also a lot of new professions appeared, like programmer and system administrator. Internet was created in the 1969 as the result of a secret project in the USA. However, the internet, in the way we understand it was invented in CERN, in 1980th. Nowadays the internet connects nearly all parts of our planet. With the help of the internet we can visit museums and art galleries, learn the latest news, prepare home assignment. Also The Internet is used for communication. We can send e-mail and chat with friends and people all over the world. And do many other activities without going out from our homes. In 1997 English scientists managed to create an exact biological copy of a sheep. This method was named cloning. This success led to tough debates in society. Cloning can made a revolution in agriculture; scientists will start cloning the best specimens of plants and animals. It can be useful in medicine. It will be possible to grow new organs to help ill people, to cure many diseases. Also cloning can use for saving animals which are in danger of extinction. But on the other hand, scientists know very few about in. We don’t know how it will influence on people. I think we live in a very interesting period. There is a rapid progress of technology and science, so by the end of, for example, 2020 our life will have changed greatly. Nearly every day scientists make new inventions. And more over that we don’t even know what it is going to be tomorrow. I believe mankind stand on the threshold of even greatest discoveries.

Protagonist How to Write a Kickass Main Character Readers Will LOVE

Protagonist How to Write a Kickass Main Character Readers Will LOVE Main Character: How to Write a Kickass Main Character Your Readers Will Love Readers will show up to your metaphorical yard for a good storybut they will come back for a good protagonistAnd well teach you how to write a main character your readers will love, root for, and even cry for.You have the story you want to tell. You know exactly how to write the novelhowever, youre not sure how to make your protagonist stand outsThe reason why so many popular books are a series of books (other than the author wanting to make a living writing several books). We all want to see the next adventure of a character we love.At some point, if you like the character enough, you stop caring what they are even getting up to (almost) and you just want to know more about them and their life.Think of any engaging character you’ve encountered in the past decade. These characters could have stopped after one go, but they keep coming back with new and interesting things to do. Sometimes they engage in stand-alone stories, other times their continuing adventures are part of the overall story structure that shows off their growth over a series.Here are some examples of great protagonists:Harry PotterSpidermanJack ReacherTony StarkThorKatniss Everdeen from Hunger GamesTobias Kaya of The Saviors ChampionAnybody that survives an episode of Game of Thrones†¦How to Write a Good Protagonist Your Readers Will RememberNot every character is worth coming back for. The staying power of a character comes from more than simply surviving the plot (though that usually helps).You need to do intense character development and give them some special quality and/or make them likable. In other words, make them kickass.While that is easier said than done, it isn’t too hard to do. Here are six ways to put some kick in your character.#1 Make Your Protagonist LikablePeople like to spend time with likable characters. Much like in real life, the off-putting people tend to get skipped over and left to the side.Think of any Tom Hanks character in any of his romantic comedies. He always plays a likeable guy, a guy you’d happily have over for dinner, spend the day with, hang with.His charisma and charm extend from there, making his characters in dramas more approachable.In the same way, if your make a character likable and personable, the reader will stick by them in the tough spots. They will care about the events that happen because they like the character. Consider the way a slasher flick sets up the characters. You know from the introduction who is going to survive the night and who isn’t. The heroes (usually a couple) stand for the same values as the audience. They are kind, good, and moral. They look out for their fellow characters in times of danger.A likable character sticks up for the little guy and adds a human quality to their supporting cast, even when that cast isn’t remotely human.When a character feels like a guide, it makes the reader feel safe. Especially in horror or thriller stories, you want the reader to be more excited to turn the page and see the next scene than they are hesitant.Examples of these likable main characters include: Harry PotterLeonard in the Big Bang TheoryJon Snow in Game of ThronesCaptain KirkTobias Kaya in The Saviors Champion#2 Make Them FunnyNot quite the same as likable and not quite the opposite either. Funny characters can get away with more than unfunny ones, but they can get annoying if pushed.Like any good joke, timing and delivery matter.Biting wit and a jocular look at the dangers all around make for some memorable character moments. Make writing dialogue for this type of character worth some outbursts of laughter and you’ll have your reader turning the pages with gleeful delight.Funny isn’t just jokes consisting of set up and punchline. You definitely don’t want to rely on a string of catchphrase utterance, no matter how much a Groot might work on occasion.The essence of wit is brevity. Quips work when they are insightful but also come from a real place. Be extra careful in establishing the backg round of a metacharacter. Deadpool’s humor doesn’t fly in all stories at all times.Funny can also mean awkward or accidentally funny.Think Ron in Harry Potter. He doesn’t mean to be funny†¦ he’s awkward, but in a lovable, hilarious way and we love him for it. The falls into trouble and falls back out of it style of character goes way back to Greek comedies. The setup for a comedy of errors relies on a likable fellow getting in over their heads and trying not to make a mess as they work it out.Examples of funny characters: Starlord and Rocket Raccoon in Guardians of the GalaxySherlock Holmes in the latest rebootsTyrian Lannister in Game of ThronesSimon Pegg’s Scotty#3 Make Your Protagonist PowerfulA character that lacks the ability to affect the world around them becomes tiresome. We want heroes challenged, sure, but we also want to know they can succeed. That when faced with the dangers of the plot and the villains they have a shot that, when it comes down to it, they can kick some ass.Tony Stark isn’t just a billionaire. He’s a billionaire genius. Take away his armor and he’s still a beloved figure with money, brains, fame and the awareness to point it all that out, if pressed on the subject.The reason we love underdog characters is because they are secretly the most powerful. They have the power to rise up and supersede the challenges, they just aren’t there yet. The likable, funny exterior makes you root for a character, but you want them to win in the end because they are better than the competition.If your character is a lawyer, they’re the best lawyer in town. If they are entering an academy to become a pilot, they are on the path to be the best pilot.A powerful character (ie- the best at something) garners respect from the reader. Remember to keep the character likable, a powerful character that uses their power to do harm becomes a villain. Redemption arcs aside, you want to avoid both a snotty character and a character that can’t be challenged.Powerful doesn’t mean perfect. One of the bonuses of being great at something is that people are quick to forgive them some of flaws. Tony Stark is arrogant. We forgive him that because there is a good reason why he’s arrogant.Genius characters can get away with being antisocial, wholesome characters can be naà ¯ve, and effective characters can be forgiven some moral grey areas.Unless you are writing noir, you want to keep the positives outshining the negatives. That balance can flip a bit for antiheroes (ie Deadpool, John Wick) but often takes a darker world to be effective.#4 Give Your Protagonist Trouble and ConflictConflict makes character. Conflict that stems from the characters internal conflicts leads to a different emotional response than conflict that stems from inevitable outside forces.Case in point, we immediately feel sorry for Jack and Rose because we know the Titanic is going down and there isn’t anything that either character could do to avoid that fate. We feel a lot less for Superman and Batman in their Doomsday fight when they need a device they casually tossed aside an hour ago.The more a conflict resonates with the reader, the more they can identify with the character. While saving the world from the terrible forces of an overwhelming alien order is fun, it isn’t relatable. It isn’t the kind of thing you are likely to face in a day.You personalize it by bringing it down to the granular. You make it about a particular personal loss, not all the losses.Examples of great conflict with protagonists:We empathize with Harry Potter because he’s an orphan, not because he’s a wizard in the wrong world.We understand what it’s like not to be believed, not so mu ch dying and being resurrected by magic like Jon Snow.We want to make a difference like Hawkeye, knowing that what we do matters even if we aren’t Thor level powerful.Be warned: there is a difference between the reader empathizing with a character and pitying them.Jack and Rose are good people enjoying life. They make the most of their last days.Harry Potter is a school kid trying his best. He (almost) never wallows in self-pity over his trials and problems.Thor loses his hammer and his eye. He makes jokes about his problems while trying to solve them instead of giving up.#5 Give Them Diverse CharacteristicsCharacter’s shouldn’t be one dimensional cardboard cut-outs. You want to make them rich and full.To this end, you don’t need to stick to one technique.As the preceding examples overlapped quite a bit, you see that mixing and matching works better than solo applications.Mix and match your protagonists characteristics like these examples: Tony Stark is powerful, likable, and funnyHarry Potter is likable, in a situation that’s relatable but outside his controlKirk is likable, often in danger outside himself, and has the skill to outpace his faultsYou don’t want to overdo it. A character that is trying to be too many things can become cluttered and confusing. Sometimes this is a result of the Superman problem, you can’t directly challenge a character designed to be too good.Flaws make for an anchor for a reader to project themselves into a character. Also, nobody likes a story where the plot dictates the effectiveness of the character from page to page.You also don’t want to alienate an audience by creating a dreaded Mary Sue (which is a perfect character who can never do wrong)†¦Leave room for flaws in your protagonist like these examples:Tony Stark is arrogant and a drunkHarry Potter lacks self-confidence and doesn’t get the girlDeadpool has cancer, is a jerk, and can’t seem to dieThe Cast of Game of Thrones is all too mortal, and largely unprotected by plot armor#6 Avoid Making a Passive CharacterA common mistake of first-time writers is to make characters reactive, otherwise known as passive.And you know just how much passive voice is a no-no in writing, passive characters are also frowned upon.While they might need to roll with the punches when they first splash into the deep end, you want them to drive the action soon after.A great character is proactive. They take charge, make a plan, and attack a problem with their skills and supporting cast.O ften, you can use the above techniques to define their approach to proactivity.Here are some questions to ask in order to learn how to avoid a passive character:Do they face their problems with a joke?Do they enlist the help of their cast of friends?Do they solve it with their power?Do they solve the problem by acknowledging that any effort matters because where they find themselves is not their fault?Keep in mind what fuels your character and they will always have a way to move forward. Not only that, the reader will be rooting for your charter as well.Great characters come from relatability and impact a reader by appealing to what we like to think about ourselves. A likable character engages a reader and can be a vector into a strange world.Likable characters humanize conflict and give readers a reason to care.Funny characters use their quips and whit to attack problems and keep the darkness at bay. We like to leave our fiction with a good feeling and jokes are how we cope with the worst of our issues.Powerful characters embody proactive approaches. A reader likes to see a character succeed and likes to know what a character is capable of so they can be in on the action, not blindsided by troubles and des ex machina.A reader likes to see real conflict. That is conflict that matters to a character and challenges the character. They don’t like to see pity and interpersonal wallowing.Think of your character like a friend. Do your best to advocate for them but remember that they aren’t you. Keep writing and let your characters speak for themselves.Start Writing a Bestseller Today (FREE class for you)This training isnt for everyone.If youre serious about writing a great fiction book that sells well (and consistently), then we have something for youIts your free training to take you from blank paged to published author!

Role of secretariat of the United Nations Research Paper

Role of secretariat of the United Nations - Research Paper Example Workers hired on a contract for less than a year sum up to around 30000 from 180 states. The Secretariat ascertains general guiding principles and offers overall regulation to the Organization. Its headquarters are situated in New York, with regional offices all over the world. Table of Contents Introduction The United Nations Secretariat - a global workforce functioning at duty stations all over the world - performs a number of tasks for the Organization. It facilitates the other major bodies of the United Nations in administering the plans and strategies. The role played by the Secretariat is as varied as the issues that the United Nations faces. These issues include, but are not limited to; (1) managing peacekeeping functions, (2) arbitrating global arguments, (3) studying fiscal as well as societal drifts and difficulties, and (4) organizing forums on constitutional rights and sustainable growth. Secretariat staff is also responsible for regularly updating the media regarding the work of the United Nations; arrange international discussions on subjects of global distress; and understand speeches and translate documents into the official languages (English and French) of the Organization (Meisler, 2011, p. 21). From the time of its foundation, the Secretariat has gone through extensive restructuring. During the first quarter of year 2005, Secretary-General Kofi Annan recommended quite a lot of transformations for the Secretariat. He declared his targets of hiring a technical consultant, forming a peace-maintaining support group, set up a cabinet-style executive system, and make the conciliation task stronger. He moreover requested the legislative body to (1) provide suitable finances for a â€Å"one-time staff buyout† (Zacklin, 2010, p. 102); (2) to support him in modifying budgetary as well as human resources regulations; (3) to give the Secretary-General additional decision-making power as well as flexibility; (4) to support the ‘Office of Int ernal Oversight Services’; and (5) to evaluate all directives that are more than five years old to notice whether the activities concerned are still actually required or whether the funds allocated to them can be transferred latest emerging challenges. Hypothesis Recently, the Secretariat of United Nations is becoming more and more involved in global peacekeeping issues and this increased involvement modifying the core operations of the organization. The Evolving Role of UN Secretariat The role of the UN Secretariat is generally administrative and incorporates the translation of papers in addition to the organization of conferences. It guarantees that the UN as well as its agencies operates efficiently. Besides, the Secretariat can as well intervene in global arguments and study fiscal and social drifts. It is also in charge for correspondence with the media. The Secretariat is formed â€Å"exclusively of civilians (approximately 250) and has some 40,000 staff members around the world† (Negroponte, 2012, p. 122). As international civil servants, employees and the Secretary-General respond to the United Nations only for their actions and take a pledge not to look for or accept orders from any Government or external power. According to the Charter, â€Å"each member state undertakes to respect the exclusively international character of the responsibilities of the Secretary-General and the staff and to refrain from seeking to influence them improperly in the discharge of their duties†

The ethical appraisal of the scientific paper which is about placeobo Essay

The ethical appraisal of the scientific paper which is about placeobo uploaded - Essay Example This paper discusses one such experiment conducted on live human subjects with use of a sham acupuncture device and an inert pill (composed mostly of starch and colored blue); the objective of the experiment was to determine the placebo effects and also measure how its supposedly enhanced effects can possibly alter the course of the ailment, which was persistent arm pain (upper extremities) due to repetitive use strain injury (Kaptchuk et al. 1). Issues on ethics are examined in the way this experiment was conducted, selection of participants, how informed consent was obtained, and other related ethical issues which might adversely affect them. In terms of selection of potential participants, the study was conducted in an ethical manner as all selected participants were willing to join the study; this means participation was voluntary, and they can opt out at any time they want at any period during the study. Further, all of them were informed of the probable side effects (pain aggravation for acupuncture and dryness of the mouth, dizziness, sleepiness and restlessness for amitriptyline) and so informed consent was properly obtained all throughout the recruitment process (ibid. 2). A study physician was always assigned and present for the duration of the research study to ensure safety of subjects, such as if they ever experienced nocebo or any side effects whatsoever. Moreover, the study authors intentionally shortened the run-in period from the original four weeks to two weeks to minimize any possible harm that might result if the participants were deprived of actual treatment for longer periods. However, an ethical ques tion is always raised by the use of placebo treatments, because the sick participants were deprived of the treatments that could have cured them of the disease or at least minimized their pain or symptoms. This was actually what happened, as several participants within the